User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SMART-TV; X11; Linux armv7l) AppleWebkit/537.42 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/25.0.1349.2 Chrome/25.0.1349.2 Safari/537.42
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-437.php
Chromium 25.0Linux unknownunknown 537.42SamsungSmart TVTV Device Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 25.0WebKit Linux SamsungSmart TVTV Device0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 25.0.1349.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19106 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 25.0WebKit GNU/Linux SamsungSmart TVtv0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 25.0.1349closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 25.0.1349.2WebKit 537.42Smart TV closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40812 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.42 SamsungSmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:32 | by ThaDafinser