User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.1.1; M717R-HD Build/JRO03H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.72 Safari/537.36 OPR/19.0.1340.69721
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Opera Mobile 19.0Android 4.1unknown VastKingM717R-HDTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 19.0Blink Android 4.1VastKingM717R-HDTabletyesyes0.075 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 19.0.1340.69721closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 19.0.1340.69721closeAndroid 4.1.1GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30009 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 19.0Blink Android 4.1yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 19.0.1340.69721closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 19.0.1340closeAndroid 4.1.1M717R-HDcloseclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.06602 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 19.0.1340.69721WebKit 537.36Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40912 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 19.0Blink Android 4.1.1M717R-HDtabletyescloseclose0.08401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 19.0.1340.69721closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Tabletyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:31 | by ThaDafinser