User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.1.2; en-US; SM-T211) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.8.1.359 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
UC Browser 8.8.1.359Android 4.1.2 SamsungGALAXY Tab 3 7.0"tablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.8U2 Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close SamsungSHV-E120Kmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25808 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.8 Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Tab 3 7.0"tabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.8.1closeAndroid 4.1.2closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.8.1.359 SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49515 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.8Gecko Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Tab 3 (7.0)tabletyescloseclose0.029 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.1SamsungSM-T211Tabletyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:31 | by ThaDafinser