User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 1.6; en-us; Motorola-XT502 Build/DONUT) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.2 Mobile Safari/525.20.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaXT502 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 3.1WebKit Android 1.6Mobile Phoneyesyes0.038 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6MotorolaXT3 XT502mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26808 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 1.6MotorolaQuenchsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid 1.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 1.6closeAndroid 1.6MotorolaXT502closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 1.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.06202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 3.1.2WebKit 528.5Android 1.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40712 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 528.5Android 1.6MotorolaQUENCH XT5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 1.6closeAndroid 1.6MotorolaXT3 XT502Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.099 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:31 | by ThaDafinser