User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Series 60; Opera Mini/6.24455/25.677; U; fr) Presto/2.5.25 Version/10.54
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Symbian OS Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 6.2Presto 2.2SymbianOS Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.54closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 6.24455closeSymbian OS OperaOpera Mini for S60mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18506 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 6.24455Presto Symbian OS Series 60 yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 6.24455close closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 6.24455closeSymbian OS closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 6.24455close closecloseclosecloseclose0.12104 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 6.24455Presto 2.5.25Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40812 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 6Presto 2.5.25Series60 mobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.54closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6.5close OperaMini 6Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:31 | by ThaDafinser