User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.6; en-us; Iris 350 Build/MocorDroid2.3.5) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LavaIris 350 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.207 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27808 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit MocorDroid 2.3LavaIris 350smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.6closeAndroid 2.3.6LavaIris 350closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iris 350closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.07402 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41012 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.6Iris 350mobile:smartyescloseclose0.09401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.065 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:30 | by ThaDafinser