User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Slackware; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/21.0 SeaMonkey/2.19
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.19Slackware Gecko 20.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 2.19Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.1 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 21.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18606 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.19Gecko Slackware desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.19closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.19closeSlackware closeclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.19closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08403 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.19Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42213 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.19Gecko 20.0Slackware desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 21.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 21.0closeMac OS X 10.7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:28 | by ThaDafinser