User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.10 Chromium/10.0.648.133 Chrome/10.0.648.133 Safari/534.16
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Ubuntu 10.10 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 10.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.034 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 10.0.648.133closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chromium 10.0.648.133closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18105 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chromium 10.0WebKit Ubuntu 10.10desktop0.02 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 10.0.648.133closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chromium 10.0.648closeUbuntu 10.10closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 10.0.648.133closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chromium 10.0.648.133WebKit 534.16Linux 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40512 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chromium 10.0.648.133Webkit 534.16Ubuntu 10.10desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 10.0.648.133closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:28 | by ThaDafinser