User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; AP-703BT Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/34.0.1847.131 YaBrowser/14.5.1847.18432.00 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AssistantAP-703BT Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 14.5Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 14.5.1847.18432.00closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.27608 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 14.5Blink Android 4.0yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 14.5.1847.18432.00closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 14.5.1847closeAndroid 4.0.4AssistantAP-703BTcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.09103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 14.5.1847.18432.0WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 14.5Blink Android 4.0.4AP-703BTtabletyescloseclose0.08201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 34.0.1847.131closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.065 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:28 | by ThaDafinser