User agent detail

HTC-A620e/UCWEB2.5.0.202/47/33624
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCA620e Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
HTC-A620e UCWEB2.5.0.202closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19006 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 2.5 HTCA620esmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 2.5.0close HTCA620ecloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.5.0.202close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 2.5.0.202 HTC A620ecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40512 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.5Gecko HTCA620emobile:featureyescloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:28 | by ThaDafinser