User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/44.0.2403.89 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-706.php
Chrome 44.0Win8.1 6.3unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 44.0Blink Win8.1 6.3Windows DesktopDesktop0.173 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.89closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.89closeWindows 6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.18806 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 44.0Blink Windows 8.1desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.89closeWindows 8.1closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 44.0.2403closeWindows 8.1 closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.89closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 44.0.2403.89WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 44Blink Windows 8.1desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 44.0.2403.89closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 44.0.2403.125closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:27 | by ThaDafinser