User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.4; zh-CN; ETON I95 Build/KTU84P) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.6.2.626 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
UC Browser 10.6.2.626Android 4.4.4WebKit EtonI95smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.6U3 Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.4GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.27808 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.6WebKit Android 4.4EtonI95smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.6.2closeAndroid 4.4.4ETON I95closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.09103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.6.2.626WebKit 534.30Android 4.4.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41913 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.6Webkit 534.30Android 4.4.4ETON I95mobile:smartyescloseclose0.08701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.021 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:27 | by ThaDafinser