User agent detail

newsbeuter/2.4 (Linux 3.2.0-23-generic; i686; http://www.newsbeuter.org/) libcurl/7.22.0 GnuTLS/2.12.14 zlib/1.2.3.4 libidn/1.23 librtmp/2.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feed_reader.yml
Newsbeuter 2.4GNU/Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
curl 7.22.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Newsbeuter 2.4closeLinux feed-readercloseclose0.20906 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Newsbeuter 2.4 GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeLinux 3.2.0closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
curl closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
cURL 7.22.0 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40812 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Newsbeuter 2.4 Linux closeclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:27 | by ThaDafinser