User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; M-MP940M Build/JOP40D[20131128.193712]) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/43.0.2357.93 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet-1.yml
Chrome 43.0.2357.93Android 4.2.1Blink MediacomSmartPad 9.7 Mobiletablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.168 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.2.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.25408 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 43.0Blink Android 4.2MediacomSmartPad 9.7 Mobiletabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 43.0.2357closeAndroid 4.2.1MediacomM-MP940Mcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.09603 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 43.0.2357.93WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41613 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 43Blink Android 4.2.1MediacomSmartPad 940tabletyescloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 43.0.2357.93closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 43closeAndroid 4.2MediacomM-MP940MTabletyesyescloseclose0.043 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:27 | by ThaDafinser