User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Maemo; Linux armv7l; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120425 Firefox/12.0 Fennec/12.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
Firefox Mobile Fennec 12.0Maemo Gecko 12.0mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Fennec 12.0Gecko 12.0Linux Smartphone OS Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 12.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Firefox 12.0closeLinux NokiaGeneric Maemo with Fennecmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19006 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Fennec 12.0Gecko Maemo yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 12.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox Mobile 12.0closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Fennec 12.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06502 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Fennec 12.0Gecko 20120425Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40212 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox Mobile Fennec 12.0Gecko 12.0Maemo mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 12.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 17.0closeMaemo NokiaGeneric Maemo with FennecFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:27 | by ThaDafinser