User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (HTC One S HTC; NetatmoApp/v1.1.3.22 Android 4.1.1) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCOne S HTC Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 5.1closeAndroid GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25108 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1HTCOne Ssmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 5.1closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1HTCOne S HTCcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.08202 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 5.1WebKit 534.46Android 4.1.1HTC One Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40512 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.46Android 4.1.1HTCOne Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.1closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.077 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:27 | by ThaDafinser