User agent detail

SonyEricssonJ230c/R5N TelecaBrowser/4.08
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonJ230c Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 4.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.099 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonJ230c R5Ncloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo 4.08close Sony EricssonJ230cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18606 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo Sony EricssonJ230cfeature phoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Teleca Browser close SonyEricssonJ230ccloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo 4.08close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13904 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sony EricssonSony Ericsson J230ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.52316 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo 4.08 Sony EricssonJ230cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SonyEricssonJ230cFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.032 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:26 | by ThaDafinser