User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 5.1.1; zh-cn; NX511J Build/LMY47V) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/5.3 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-4.yml
QQ Browser 5.3Android 5.1.1WebKit ZTENubia Z9 minismartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 5.1.1GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose3.39002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 5.3WebKit Android 5.1ZTENubia Z9 minismartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 5.3closeAndroid 5.1.1NX511Jcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.05302 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 5.3WebKit 534.30Android 5.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40612 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 5.3Webkit 534.30Android 5.1.1ZTENubia Z9 minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.035 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 44closeAndroid 5.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.111 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:25 | by ThaDafinser