User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/534+ (KHTML, like Gecko) FireWeb/1.0.0.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows 7 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 534closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
FireWeb 1.0.0.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20006 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
FireWeb 1.0.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.07102 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 534Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41012 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
FireWeb 1.0.0.0Webkit 534Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:24 | by ThaDafinser