User agent detail

LG-KM900/V100 Obigo/WAP2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UNTRUSTED/1.0 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; en-US; LG-KM900) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.0.342 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGKM900 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo JAVA LGKM900Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-KM900 V100closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM GenericJ2ME Midletmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19106 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 LGKM900smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.0close LGKM900closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.10803 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo WAP2 Browser WAP2 LGLGKM900closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41012 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo WAP 2.0Gecko LGKM900mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close LGKM900Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:24 | by ThaDafinser