User agent detail

MozillaQtWRT/1.05.0 (SymbianQtWRT/1.03; U; NokiaN8-00QtWRT/1.0RM-59601; ConfigurationQtWRT/1.0CLDC-1.1 ProfileQtWRT/1.0MIDP-2.1; ar-AE) AppleWebKitQtWRT/1.0532.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) BrowserNGQtWRT/1.08.0.r19209 Mobile SafariQtWRT/1.0532.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
NokiaN8-00QtWRT Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.059 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari closeSymbian OS mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19506 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian NokiaN8smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 1.0RM-59601;closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 8close NokiaN8-00QtWRTcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeSymbian closecloseclosecloseclose0.06802 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser WebKit NokiaOS NokiaNokia N8-00QtWRTcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40912 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Browser NokiaN8-00QtWRTmobile:featureyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:23 | by ThaDafinser