User agent detail

TBDB863 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.34 Safari/534.24
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Chrome 11.0Android 4.3unknown ZekiTBDB863Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 11.0WebKit Android 4.3ZekiTBDB863Tabletyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19906 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 11.0WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 11.0.696closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04902 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 11.0.696.34WebKit 534.24Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40812 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 11Webkit 534.24Linux desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.34closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:23 | by ThaDafinser