User agent detail

PPC; 240x320; HTC_Mega-T3333-Orange; OpVer 113.128.2.733 Opera/9.50 (Microsoft Windows 6.5; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsmobile.yaml
Opera Mobile 9.50Windows Mobile HTCTouch 2mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 9.50Presto 2.2WinMobile HTCTouch2Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 9.50closeWindows 6.5HTCMegamobile-browseryescloseclose0.18906 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.50Presto Windows HTCMega-T3333-Orangesmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.50closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.50closeWindows HTCMega-T3333-Orangecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.50close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13404 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.50 Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40912 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 9.50 Windows Mobile HTCTouch 2mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close HTCMegaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:22 | by ThaDafinser