User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
Internet Explorer 7.0Windows XPTrident desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18806 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows XPdesktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 7.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.05502 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41513 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 7.0 Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:22 | by ThaDafinser