User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; M6 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.115 YaBrowser/15.2.2214.3725.01 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Yandex Browser 15.2Android 4.4unknown PiPOM6Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.4PiPOM6Tabletyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 15.2.2214.3725.01closeAndroid 4.4.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.27608 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.4yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 15.2.2214.3725.01closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 15.2.2214closeAndroid 4.4.2PipoM6closeclosecloseclose0.013 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09103 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 15.2.2214.3725.1WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.36911 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 15.2Blink Android 4.4.2M6tabletyescloseclose0.07801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4Tabletyesyescloseclose0.04 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:21 | by ThaDafinser