User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; zh-cn;GiONEE-GN181/GN181 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit534.30(KHTML,like Gecko)Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 Id/FCB3EE82B1D8E8F12C98794F18A7F1A5 RV/4.1.2 GNBR/1.5.6.ae (securitypay,securityinstalled)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
GioneeGN181 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Version 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2GenericAndroid 4.1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24807 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1GioneeGN181smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.2closeAndroid 4.1.2GioneeGN181closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit Android 4.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 4.0.4GioneeGN181mobile:smartyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.063 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:20 | by ThaDafinser