User agent detail

stamhub 1.0.36/GT-P5100; 36; 1.0.36; com.samsung.videohub; espresso10rf; samsung/espresso10rfxx/espresso10rf:4.0.4/IMM76D/P5100XWBLE4:user/release-keys
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Samsungvideohub Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
stamhub closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close Samsung.videohub; espresso10rf; samsungmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25308 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungGALAXY Tab 2 10.1"tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Samsungvideohubcloseclosecloseclose0.017 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose1.09233 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung.videohub; espresso10rf; samsungmobile:featureyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:19 | by ThaDafinser