User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.2; de-de; GT-I9128 Build/JZO54K) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko)Version/4.0 MQQBrowser/4.4 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9128 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.047 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-I9128mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26908 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 4.4WebKit Android 4.1SamsungGALAXY Grandphabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 4.4closeAndroid 4.1.2SamsungGT-I9128closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.07702 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 4.4WebKit 533.1Android 4.1.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40912 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 4.4Webkit 533.1Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy Grandmobile:smartyescloseclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1SamsungGT-I9128Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.098 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:19 | by ThaDafinser