User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html) ASProxy/5.5b5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/bots/generic.yaml
yesGooglebot Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler0.048 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Googlebot 2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesGooglebotclose0.18506 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGooglebotSearch bot0.002 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotCrawler0.06002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Googlebot 2.1 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40812 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGooglebotclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closecloseclosecloseclosecloseyesGooglebotclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:19 | by ThaDafinser