User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; en-US) AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML, like Gecko, Safari/528.5+) Version/4.0 Kindle/3.3 (screen 600x800; rotate)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmazonKindle 3.3 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Kindle 3.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Kindle Browser 3.3closeLinux AmazonKindle 3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18911 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Kindle Browser 3.3WebKit GNU/Linux AmazonKindletabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 4.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Kindle 3.3closeKindle 3.3AmazonKindle 3.3closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Kindle Browser closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06604 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Kindle Browser WebKit 528.5Fire OS AmazonKindle 3.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 528.5 AmazonKindleereaderyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 4.0closeLinux AmazonKindle 3Other Mobileyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:18 | by ThaDafinser