User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; ; Linux armv5tejl; U) Opera 8.02 [de_DE] Maemo browser 0.4.34 N770/SU-18
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-maemo.yaml
Opera Mobile 8.02Maemo NokiaN770mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 8.02closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 8.02closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.21713 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MicroB 0.4Gecko Maemo yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera SU-18closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 8.2closeMaemo closeclosecloseclose0.027 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 8.02closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05303 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 8.2 Maemo closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.4943 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 8.02 Maemo NokiaN770mobile:smartyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeMaemo NokiaGeneric MaemoFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:17 | by ThaDafinser