User agent detail

Sogou-Test-Spider/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Sogou-Test-Spider 4.0 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesSogou-Test-SpiderBot/Crawler0.011 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesSogou-Test-Spider/4.0close0.20612 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 98closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesSogou-Test-Spiderclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.5closeWindows 98 closecloseclosecloseclose0.04603 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sogou "Search Dog" Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesclose0.03 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.5closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:16 | by ThaDafinser