User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; nl-NL) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) WeTab-Browser Safari/534.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
WeTab Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
WeTab Browser WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 534.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 534.3closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18911 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
WeTab Browser WebKit MeeGo yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
WeTab closeWeTab WeTabWeTabcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06304 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 534.3Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40524 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 534.3Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:16 | by ThaDafinser