User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.3; SGH-T989D Build/IML74K) AppleWebKit/535.19 (KHTML
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-T989D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 535.19closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3SamsungGalaxy S II Xmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25215 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0SamsungSGH-T989Dsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.3closeAndroid 4.0.3SamsungSGH-T989Dcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 535.19Android 4.0.3Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41025 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 535.19Android 4.0.3SamsungGalaxy S II Xmobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 18closeAndroid 4.0SamsungSGH-T989DSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.124 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:16 | by ThaDafinser