User agent detail

SIE-A75/20 Profile/MIDP-1.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 UP.Browser/6.1.0.5.c.6 (GUI) MMP/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SiemensA75 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 SiemensA75Mobile Phoneyes0.024 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SIE-A75 20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.5.c.6close SiemensA75mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18511 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1 SiemensA75smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.1.0close SiemensA75closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.1.0.5.c.6 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.1 SiemensA75mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SiemensA75Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.05 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:15 | by ThaDafinser