User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/5.0; WOW64; Trident/5.0; BingPreview/1.0b)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
yesBingPreviewBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesBingPreviewBot/Crawler0.079 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 9.0closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19612 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesBingBotSearch bot0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
BingPreview 1.0closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.11307 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
BingPreview 1.0bTrident 5.0Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41825 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesBing Previewclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11(Compatibility View)closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:13 | by ThaDafinser