User agent detail

SonyEricssonU1iv/R1BB; Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; U; Series60/5.0 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/525 (
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonU1iv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SEMC SymbianOS SonyEricssonU1ivMobile Phoneyes0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 525closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nokia Web Browser closeSymbian OS 9.4SonyEricssonU1ivmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18511 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser 7.0WebKit Symbian OS Series 60 5.0Sony EricssonSatiofeature phoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia Browser 7.0closeSymbian OS 9.4SonyEricssonU1ivcloseclosecloseclose0.016 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 Nokia BrowsercloseSymbianOS 9.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06304 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 525Symbian Sony EricssonSony Ericsson U1ivcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41125 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 525Series60 5.0Sony EricssonSatiomobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SymbianOS closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Symbian S60 Browser closeSymbian S60 9.4SonyEricssonU1ivFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.029 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:12 | by ThaDafinser