User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; A5_Duo Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.57 Mobile Safari/537.36 OPR/18.0.1290.67495
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MyPhoneA5 Duo Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.23 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 18.0.1290.67495closeAndroid 4.2.2Allviewa5 Duomobile-browseryescloseclose0.27617 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.2yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 18.0.1290closeAndroid 4.2.2MyPhoneA5 Duocloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06404 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 18.0.1290.67495WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41125 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 18.0Blink Android 4.2.2A5_Duomobile:smartyescloseclose0.07701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 18.0.1290.67495closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 18closeAndroid 4.2Allviewa5 DuoSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.092 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:12 | by ThaDafinser