User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.1.1; zh-cn; vivo E5 Build/JRO03C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30 V1_AND_SQ_4.6.1_9_YYB_D PA QQ/4.6.1.2110
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
vivoE5 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.123 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1VivoE5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26416 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1VivoVivo E5smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.1.1closeAndroid 4.1.1vivoE5closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.19612 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42726 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 4.6Webkit 534.30Android 4.1.1VivoE5mobile:smartyescloseclose0.05901 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.1closeAndroid 4.1VivoE5Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.073 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:12 | by ThaDafinser