User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 ( Nokia7510Supernova/2.0 (03.80) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) AppleWebKit/420 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/420
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia7510Supernova Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.123 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 420closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 420close desktop-browsercloseclose0.21113 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia Browser WebKit Symbian Nokia7510Supernovasmartphoneyes0.016 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Nokia 7510close Nokia7510Supernovacloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.07404 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Safari WebKit 420NokiaOS NokiaNokia 7510Supernovacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40524 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 420Series40 Nokia7510 Supernovamobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close Nokia7510Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:11 | by ThaDafinser