User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; zh-CN; TCL P728M Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser-CMCC/9.5.2.394 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
UC Browser Android 4.4.2WebKit TCLP728Msmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.4Mobile Phoneyesyes0.019 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.26616 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser WebKit Android 4.4TCLP728Msmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.2closeAndroid 4.4.2TCLP728Mcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.29618 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser WebKit 533.1Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40424 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser Webkit 533.1Android 4.4.2TCLP728mobile:smartyescloseclose0.033 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.104 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:11 | by ThaDafinser