User agent detail

MOZILLA50 (SYMBIANOS93 U EN SERIES60/32 NOKIA6650D-1BH/
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Nokia6650D-1BH Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Nokia NokiaMobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeSeries60 32Nokia6650 foldmobile-browseryescloseclose0.22213 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Nokia OSS Browser 32 Symbian OS Series 60 32Nokia6650D-1BHsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close Nokia6650D-1BHcloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Browser for S60 closeSYMBIANOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.05803 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Nokia Browser Symbian Nokiacloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41125 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Series60 32Nokia6650 foldmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:10 | by ThaDafinser