User agent detail

Nokia200/2.0 (11.95) Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UCWEB/2.0 (Java; U; MIDP-2.0; xx; Nokia200) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.4.1.377 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 9.4Series40 Gecko NokiaAsha 200mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.4U2 JAVA Nokia200Mobile Phoneyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Nokia200 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close NokiaNokia Asha 200mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19512 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.4 Symbian Nokia200smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Nokia Browser 2.0closeNokia closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.4.1close Nokia200closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06504 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.4.1.377 NokiaOS NokiaNokia 200closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40925 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.4Gecko Series40 NokiaAsha 200mobile:featureyescloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UCBrowser Java Applet 9close NokiaNokia Asha 200Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:10 | by ThaDafinser