User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.89 Vivaldi/1.0.83.38 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-638.php
Vivaldi 1.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Vivaldi 1.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.162 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.21213 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Vivaldi 1.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Vivaldi 1.0.83closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.11307 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Vivaldi 1.0.83.38WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41525 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Vivaldi 1.0Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.89closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 40.0.2214.115closeWindows 10Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:09 | by ThaDafinser