User agent detail

libwww-perl/6.05
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-849.php
yeslibwwwBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yeslibwwwBot/Crawler0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
libwww-perl 6.05closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
libwww-perl 6.05close software-librarycloseclose0.19812 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Perl 6.05 0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
libwww-perl 6.05close closecloseclosecloseclose0.13308 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Library for WWW in Perl 6.5 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40224 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesPerlclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library perlcloseclosecloseclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Other Non-Mobilecloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:09 | by ThaDafinser