User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; LG-E730 Build/IMM76L; ro-ro) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/30.0.1599.114 Mobile Safari/537.36 Puffin/4.2.0.1834AP
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-712.php
Puffin 4.2Android 4.0unknown LGE730Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 4.2Blink Android 4.0LGE730Mobile Phoneyesyes0.076 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 30.0.1599.114closeAndroid 4.0.4LGE730mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29518 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 4.2WebKit Android 4.0LGE730smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 4.2.0closeAndroid 4.0.4LGE730closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.10907 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 4.2.0.1834WebKit 537.36 Android Phonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40824 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 4.2.0Blink Android 4.0.4LGOptimus Solmobile:smartyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 30.0.1599.114closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 30closeAndroid 4.0LGE730Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:08 | by ThaDafinser