User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 3.2.1; LG-LU8300 Build/HTK75D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/29.0.1547.72 Safari/537.36 OPR/16.0.1212.64462
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGLU8300 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 16.0Blink Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.077 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 3.2.1GenericAndroid 3.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26516 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 16.0Blink Android 3.2LGLU8300smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeAndroid 3.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 16.0.1212closeAndroid 3.2.1LGLU8300closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.07204 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 16.0.1212.64462WebKit 537.36Android 3.2.1LGLGLU8300closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.57935 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 16.0Blink Android 3.2.1LGOptimus Pad LTEtabletyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 16.0.1212.64462closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 3.2closeAndroid 3.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.07 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:08 | by ThaDafinser