User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (MIDP-2.0; U; Adr 4.2.2; id; R1001) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/9.5.1.494 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 9.5.1.494Android 4.2.2 OPPOR1001smartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.5U2 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close RegusRD 330mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26316 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.5 Android 4.2OPPOR1001smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.5.1closeAndroid 4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05003 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.5.1.494 Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40224 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.5Gecko Android 4.2.2OppoJoy R1001mobile:smartyescloseclose0.025 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:08 | by ThaDafinser