User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; de; rv:1.8.1.20) Gecko/20081217 Firefox/2.0.0.20
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
Firefox 2.0MacOSX 101.8 AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 2.0Gecko 1.8MacOSX 10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeOS X desktop-browsercloseclose0.19212 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 2.0Gecko Mac desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 2.0.0closeMac OS X closeclosecloseclose0.019 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeOS X closecloseclosecloseclose0.06204 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 2.0.0.20Gecko 20081217Mac OS X closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40524 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 2.0.0.20Gecko 1.8.1OS X desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 2.0.0.20closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:08 | by ThaDafinser