User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.3; HP 635 Notebook PC Build/JSS15J) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.63 Safari/537.36 OPR/15.0.1162.60140
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HP635 Notebook PC Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 15.0Blink Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.02 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 15.0.1162.60140closeAndroid 4.3GenericAndroid 4.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.28617 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.3yes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 15.0.1162closeAndroid 4.3HP635 Notebook PCcloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.08505 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 15.0.1162.60140WebKit 537.36Android 4.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41025 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 15.0Blink Android 4.3HP 635 Notebook PCtabletyescloseclose0.14602 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 15.0.1162.60140closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.3Tabletyesyescloseclose0.071 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:37:06 | by ThaDafinser